Recall the
Chändogya Upanishad description of the creation of the world that we discussed
in an earlier post. Originally there was a single entity. But that single
entity took different names and forms and ‘became’ many.
Once it
became many, each form has its own limitations and properties. In that respect
no two forms are identical. An apple is not same as orange – each has a
different shape, color, looks, taste and so on. So also, any two individuals –
you are not identical to me. We are different in our own ways. Are we at least
same as that ‘original’ thing from which we all came from? Definitely not. The
original ‘That’ had neither form, nor any limitations.
This is the
Dvaita philosophy of Madhva. He said – “no two inert (‘Jada’) things are
identical, nor are they same as any living being (‘Jiva’). Neither are they
comparable with ‘That’ (‘Paramätma’). Similarly, no two living beings are
identical, nor any of them are comparable with ‘That’”.
In essence,
there are five kinds of differences between three categories of entities namely
‘That’, soul and inert things. i.e.
- difference between inert things,
- difference between inert and living beings,
- difference between inert things and ‘That’,
- difference between living beings ,
- difference between living beings and ‘That’
This is the
so called ‘Bheda väda’ (philosophy of differences) or commonly called Dvaita
philosophy of Madhva. Since the original ‘That’ was real, each of the other two
categories of entities is also real. So, not only the world but also the
diversity in the world is real.
Does this
mean that the other philosophy, namely that of Šankara is wrong? Let us see
that in the next post.
No comments:
Post a Comment