In the
previous posts we saw the origin and final destiny of the universe that we see
around. But Swetaketu was still not convinced in spite of his father reasoning
it out the way we did in previous posts. So, father gives more analogies to
sink in the truth.
He asks the
son to bring a seed of a huge Banyan tree. The tree is huge, diverse but it is
a fact that such a huge and diverse tree sprang out from a tiny seed. But, if
one breaks open the seed, one can never see the tree inside, however much one
magnifies it. But the tree did emerge from a tiny seed. So it is possible for a
vast, diverse world to emerge from a subtle cause like Sath.
How is it
that we don’t see this prime cause operating? The next illustration that the
father gives is as follows. The father asks Swetaketu to dissolve some salt
into water. Once dissolved, the salt is not visible, but its existence can be
inferred by tasting the water taken from any part of the solution. So also, the
Sath pervades all that that emerged
from it, but still remains imperceptible to casual observation.
But how is it
that all these things finally return back to the Sath at the end of the ‘creation-re absorption’ cycle? Swetaketu’s father
gives the simile of the rivers that finally merge with the sea and become one
with it. Before merger, each river was different, had its own name and form.
But post merger, they all lose their separate name and form and become one with
the sea. They came from the sea, and finally merged into the sea.
So what is
‘that’ truth we started with in the beginning?
We will see
that in the next post.
This is a series of posts based on the well known
discussion in Chändogya Upanishad (part of Säma Veda, believed to have been
recorded more than 3000 years ago) regarding ultimate truths.
No comments:
Post a Comment